Division of General Internal Medicine
           Section of Social Medicine

  
 

 

Home Members Events Projects Links

  Contact Information
  David R. Buchanan, MD
  Section Head
  Section of Social Medicine
  1900 W. Polk, 9th Floor
  Chicago, IL 60612
  david_buchanan@rush.edu

  Lisa Stevak, MA
  Section Coordinator
  Tel: 312-864-7333
  Fax: 312-864-9500
  lisa_stevak@rush.edu

February 26, 2007

Presenter:  Robyn Gabel

Agenda
9:30-
9:35
   Business Items:  Update of Section Member Activities

9:35-10:30
   Executive Director of the Illinois Maternal and Child Health Coalition, Robyn Gabel works 
   to affect public policy in the areas of women and children's health and economic
   development.  As a recipient of the Chicago Community Trust Fellowship in Community
   Leadership, Ms. Gabel spent a year investigating the "Hispanic Paradox,"  a
   phenomenon in which Mexican immigrants give birth to healthier babies than the second
   generation of Mexican-American's born in Chicago. 


Meeting Minutes
Business
We have not yet scheduled a speaker for our March 19th meeting.  Please contact Lisa if you would like to lead a discussion. 

Presentation
Thirteen people were in attendance from General Internal Medicine, Obstetrics, and Nursing.

Robyn Gabel explained that the Chicago Community Trust offers a Fellowship in Community Leadership to individuals who have been not-for-profit leaders for more than 10 years. The fellowship is designed to give recipients time to renew their commitment to their fields and the public sector.  During Ms. Gabel’s 13-month fellowship, she studied the Hispanic Paradox as it pertains to maternal and infant health, focusing on why first- and second-generation, American-born Mexican-Americans give birth to a greater number of preterm babies and to babies with a lower birth weight compared with Mexican-born, first generation Mexican-Americans.  She also went to learn about healthcare in France because it has the world’s best health system and England because of health disparities research conducted there.

Ms. Gabel reviewed the literature; interviewed health professionals and lay workers, and pregnant or parenting Mexican-American women; and lived and studied in Mexico to learn more about Mexican culture and how it supports pregnant women.  In Mexico, having children is highly desired.  When a woman is pregnant, the family is very supportive and everyone lends a hand to see to her well-being.  One cultural belief found in Mexico is that if the food cravings of a pregnant woman are not satisfied, then the baby will be born with a birthmark.  Thus, in many cases, a pregnant woman needs only mention she would like a certain something to eat and family members go out immediately to find the desired food or the ingredients necessary to make it.  Mexican women tend not to do or take anything that might harm the baby, including through the delivery.  This means that coffee and alcohol are avoided, substance use is not a problem, and hard physical labor is not done.  Additionally, the family protects the pregnant woman from stress and expects her to rest.  Mexican immigrants to the U.S. bring these cultural beliefs with them and continue to provide social support for pregnant woman.

A literature review revealed NO direct correlation between good nutrition, social support, spirituality, and migrant status with birth weight and preterm births among Mexican-American women.  However, a few studies have found that higher acculturation combined with increased prenatal stress do seem to be more commonly found among second- and third- generation Mexican Americans and may account for lower birth weights and higher preterm babies.  In a survey Ms. Gabel conducted, she found that both women born in Mexico and in the U.S. sought pre-natal care early, ate nutritiously, abstained from drinking alcohol or smoking, received family support during and after the pregnancy, and walked for exercise. 

Significant differences between the two groups were the age of the first pregnancy and the level of discrimination experienced.  The average age of the first pregnancy for first generation (Mexican-born) Mexican-American women was 21 years versus only 17 years for U.S.-born Mexican Americans women, although sexual activity starts at about the same age for both groups.  U.S.-born Mexican American women reported higher rates of discrimination.  Only 50% of first-generation Mexican American women reported experiencing discrimination, and then primarily because they did not speak English.  In contrast, 90% of U.S.-born Mexican American women reported having endured discrimination or knowing someone who had been discriminated against, mostly from police.  One woman reported being stopped by the police when she and her husband were driving one night.  The police officer asked the woman why she was out so late with the man in the car.  The woman replied that the man was her husband.  The police officer told her she had made a bad choice. 

Ms. Gabel made 4 recommendations:

  1. Treat racial discrimination seriously, especially from the police
  2. Work to reduce teen pregnancy, including making contraceptives readily available and teaching about human reproduction in school.
  3. Increase institutional support for women who are pregnant by decreasing stress and encouraging more rest among women who are pregnant
  4. Help women be more healthy before they become pregnant

Group discussion focused on how schools in the Chicagoland area are unwelcoming environments for teenagers who are pregnant, regardless of their racial or ethnic group.  Schools do not accommodate pregnant teenagers by sending home homework when the student misses class, understanding that the student might need more rest and therefore need longer to complete class assignments, or by providing affordable child care after the baby is born. 

Ms. Gabel then told us about what she had learned in France.  She noted that the age people become sexually active is similar in both France and the U.S.  However, in France only 20.2 births per one thousand were to teenage moms compared with 83.6 in the U.S.  She accounts for this difference in two ways.  First, the provision of sex education in French schools is at an early age and discusses birth control.  Second, contraceptives are readily available and no stigma is attached to their purchase.

France is a pro-natalist country.  In the 1990s the healthcare system became concerned about preterm births and developed the recommendation that women not work upon entering the third trimester of pregnancy.  It was felt that the stress caused by working and transportation affected birth outcomes.  To promote this recommendation, the government enacted legislation that allows a woman to receive her full salary for six months (three months before the birth and three months after).  Moreover, women receive financial support to stay home with their children during the first three years after the baby’s birth.  Public pre-school is available to every child beginning at the age of 3.  In order to make this policy affordable to employers, all employers pay into a fund that is then used to fund this pro-natalist policy.  Women are paid from this fund while employers are able to hire replacements for the length of time their employees are at home.  Unfortunately, France does not track health disparities by race but by class.  For example, professional, more educated women have better access to quality prenatal care than unskilled, lower-income women.  We do know that undocumented residents in France do not have access to health care.  The French government passed legislation to provide prenatal care to illegal immigrants who are pregnant and provided housing stability by allowing pregnant women to stay in their residence throughout their pregnancy.

In England, birth outcomes by ethnicity have been tracked since the 1990s.  Immigrants and refugees are less likely to have access to care and receive lower quality of care.  To reduce such disparities, Sure Start centers (similar to Healthy Start programs here in the U.S.), are established in low-income areas and provide a team approach to strengthen families and communities and offer early and continuous prenatal care.  These centers are located in the community rather than the hospital.  Interestingly in England, OBs attend only 28% of births.  England’s 30,000 midwives oversee the majority of births. 

Based on what Robyn Gabel learned in France and England, she makes the following recommendations:

  1. The U.S. needs some form of universal health care

  2. Systematic health policies should promote healthy families and communities through a team approach to health (much discussion about this occurs in the U.S. but little is done)

  3. Encourage early prenatal care using peer outreach

  4. Decrease teenage pregnancies with health education and access to birth control

  5. Institute a family allowance to prepare for the baby and consider providing opportunities for women to reduce stress while they are pregnant.

 

These minutes were written by Lisa Stevak.  Please report any errors to her at lisa_stevak@rush.edu

 

 

Copyright ©2005, Stroger Hospital, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Social Medicine.
Contact the webmaster with questions or comments. Site updated 03/02/2007.